Counting Mosques

New York Post

by Daniel Pipes
February 4, 2003

Startling news came last week out of the FBI: The leadership had directed all of the bureau's 56 field offices to count mosques in their regions as part of waging the war on terror.

Newsweek, which broke this story, explained that the information on mosques would specifically help "set numerical goals for counter terrorism investigations and secret national-security wiretaps in each region." The New York Times acquired a closed-door statement by a senior bureau official confirming the mosque data would be used "to help establish a yardstick for the number of terrorism investigations and intelligence warrants" expected from field offices.

Reactions on the Left and among Islamists were predictably outraged. The American Civil Liberties Union denounced the mosque-counting as "tailor-made for a witch hunt."

What exactly does the ACLU stand for? It is an undeniable fact that the mosques teach their Koran:

004.101 When ye travel through the earth, there is no blame on you if ye shorten your prayers, for fear the Unbelievers May attack you: For the Unbelievers are unto you open enemies.

009.004 (But the treaties are) not dissolved with those Pagans with whom ye have entered into alliance and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor aided any one against you. So fulfil your engagements with them to the end of their term.

009.005 But when the forbidden months are past [when the 'treaties' expire}  then fight and slay the Pagans ''''wherever'''' ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war. {that is discriminatory Murder!]

008.067 It is not fitting for a prophet that he should have prisoners of war [slay them] until he hath thoroughly subdued the land. [Treason - in all non-Muslim nations]

Why is the ACLU defending such teachings? Don't they know ANY shame?

Treason:

1. Violation of allegiance toward one's country or sovereign, especially the betrayal of one's country by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.

2. A betrayal of trust or confidence.

In the United States, treason is confined to the actual levying of war against the United States, or to an adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

Article. III. Section. 3.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

004.094 O ye who believe! When ye  ''''go abroad''''   in the cause of Allah, investigate carefully, and say not to any one who offers you a salutation: "Thou art none of a believer!" Therefore carefully investigate. 

008.074 Those who believe, and adopt exile, and fight for the Faith, in the cause of Allah as well as those who give (them) asylum and aid, - these are (all) in very truth the Believers.

The Koran [which does speak out loud in all mosques] has MILLIONS of followers. How many more witnesses are needed?

What has happened to the 'wisdom' of the American authorities?

The Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism expressed "deep concern" about fundamental constitutional protections being abridged. The Muslim Public Affairs Council deemed it going "beyond the pale of legitimate law enforcement."

 Article. IV. Section. 4.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

008.067 It is not fitting for a prophet that he should have prisoners of war [slay them] until he hath thoroughly subdued the land. {Is that not considered to be Treason? in America? Yet, America is allowing such a command (believed to be 'sacred') to be taught throughout the land. What kind of sense does that make?]

But the most colorful response came from the American Muslim Council, a Washington-based militant Islamic group. AMC characterized mosque-counting as an act of "political repression" by the U.S. government and wrote a letter to the United Nations pleading for relief from this and other "shameful and undemocratic practices."

The U.N. claims to be 'humanitarians'? The Koran Clearly VIOLATES even the laws of the U.N.!!!

What are "shameful and undemocratic practices" according to the America Muslim Council?

009.004 (But the treaties are) not dissolved with those Pagans with whom ye have entered into alliance and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor aided any one against you. So fulfil your engagements with them to the end of their term.

009.005 But when the forbidden months are past [when the 'treaties' expire}  then fight and slay the Pagans ''''wherever'''' ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war.

008.067 It is not fitting for a prophet that he should have prisoners of war [slay them] until he hath thoroughly subdued the land. [Treason]

009.029 Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

047.004 Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers [Includes ALL who believe in the Son of God} 009.030 ] (in fight), smite at their necks. [Behead them]

"shameful and undemocratic practices" ??? [Not according to the Muslims]

Barraged with criticisms, the FBI dissimulated, pretending that the purpose of mosque-counting has nothing to do with preventing possible mosque-based terrorist actions but is intended to learn the "vulnerabilities" of those structures, the better to protect them from possible assault.

Why do the American authorities keep refusing to quote the god of the Muslims?

If they quote him - are they not speaking a truth that leaves ALL Muslims without argument? Are they afraid they'll be confronted with the commands of the Bible? The New Testament Clearly condemns the commands of the Koran.

The Bible condemns Palestine for end times. The Koran forgot to mention it - and it should have - because it is the desire of the Muslims - more than any other people.

Shouldn't that fact prove to ALL Americans that the Koran is a fake testament? spoken by one lone accuser? who commands that ALL who believe in the Son of God} 009.030 - 019.089 be slaughtered? [And this is ok with American authorities???]

009.005 But when the forbidden months are past [when the 'treaties' expire}  then fight and slay the Pagans ''''wherever'''' ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war.

008.039 And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere. [Throughout the earth} 004.101 ]

Muslims who deny that fact - are calling their own 'allah' - a liar!

Why does the leading law-enforcement institution in the United States hide its counterterrorism efforts? It's known that some mosques throughout the West have been used as a base for terror, filling a variety of roles:

* Inciting violence: Brooklyn's Al-Farooq Mosque was where the blind sheik inspired the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

* Planning operations: Milan's Islamic cultural center served as al Qaeda's main European base.

* Storing weapons: London's Finsbury Park Mosque, in a raid last month, yielded a stun gun, a blank-firing replica firearm, and a gas canister.

Nor is the FBI alone in hiding its methods. The Immigration and Naturalization Service last month began requiring "certain temporary foreign visitors" from 25 countries to register in its offices. The INS pretends it is unaware that (with the exception of nearly nonexistent North Korean visitors) all the affected persons hail from Muslim-majority countries.

The INS does so via the time-honored bureaucratic practice of hiding behind ungrammatical obfuscation: "Under this program," it states, "temporary foreign visitors (non-immigrant aliens) coming from certain countries or who meet a combination of intelligence-based criteria are identified as presenting elevated national security concerns." Say that again?

Actually, there is a good reason for the FBI and INS to lie or mumble about devoting special attention to Muslims: This practice contradicts declared policy. When President Bush states that "Islam is peace" and refers to "the peaceful teachings of Islam," how can his law-enforcement or immigration staff acknowledge that Islam has any bearing on their work?

The Royal Command is:

Zec 8:16 These are the things that ye shall do; Speak ye every man the truth to his neighbour; execute the judgment of truth and peace in your gates.

Eph 4:25 Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another.

Because...

Isa 45:19 I have not spoken in secret, in a dark place of the earth: I said not unto the seed of Jacob, Seek ye Me in vain: I the LORD speak righteousness, I declare things that are right. [and Powerful]

2Cr 10:4 The weapons [Scriptures] of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;

Hbr 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful

The Koran teaches Treason in America. The Bible does not. And according to the U.S. constitution - the Koran's teachings are a VIOLATION to U.S. law.

By quoting the allah of the Koran [OUT LOUD!] - NO room is left for any defense for Islam in America. What Muslim can argue with allah?

And 'allah' does argue with the U.S. constitution!

A vast disconnect, in other words, exists between the high-flying words of politicians and the sometimes sordid realities of counterterrorism. This discrepancy has real costs:

* Government employees on the front lines face a dilemma: To do an effective job, they run the risk of being accused of running afoul of studiously impartial government regulations, or even of breaking the law.

* The public is confused: Policy statements piously reject any link between Islam and terrorism {A Great and Grave Deception], but the actions of fighting terror implicitly make just such a connection.

* Militant Islamic groups exploit this duality to argue that U.S. government declarations are mere puffery meant to disguise what really is a war against Islam.

* Ordinary Muslims are confused. Do they believe their ears, or their eyes? Do they listen to hypocritical politicians or straight-talking Islamists?

The gap between theory and practice can only be addressed by honest and open debate. Does the body politic want law enforcement to pay extra attention to Muslims? Does it favor Muslim visitors having to fill out extra paperwork? These practices exist at present, but in a limbo, without sanction or legitimacy. They need either to be ended or made official.

So long as the Koran has free reign - 'terrorists' will continue to carry out their 'duty'

004.101 When ye travel through the earth, there is no blame on you if ye shorten your prayers, for fear the Unbelievers May attack you: For the Unbelievers are unto you open enemies.

009.005 fight and slay the Pagans ''''wherever'''' ye find them

008.039 And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere.

008.067 It is not fitting for a prophet that he should have prisoners of war [slay them] until he hath thoroughly subdued the land.

047.004 Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers [Includes ALL who believe in the Son of God} 009.030 ] (in fight), smite at their necks. [Behead them]

Those Islamic commands - are what is being taught in the mosques - Every single one of them! ['allah' says so]

"shameful and undemocratic practices" ???

Why is America allowing it?

NOTE:  To dispel the claim that the Koran is being misinterpreted? 

Here on this site - 'allah' speaks for himself - and the people are free to judge for themselves - the things they will hear.

 

Introduction