|
ACLU to appeal Quran ruling
News-Record.com
Dec 16,
2005
GREENSBORO -- Officials with the
American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina said Thursday that they will
appeal last week's ruling regarding courtroom oaths.
The ACLU had filed a lawsuit on behalf of its roughly 8,000 members asking the
court to clarify that state law allows people to use non-Christian religious
scriptures for oath-taking.
Greensboro Muslim Syidah Mateen, who joined the suit, claimed she was harmed in
2003 when a judge did not allow her to take an oath on the Quran when testifying
in a Guilford County courtroom.
However, Superior Court Judge Donald L. Smith tossed out the lawsuit on Dec. 8,
deciding that the plaintiffs lacked a legal controversy.
The judge determined that because
Mateen testified that day, no legal controversy remained.
She
says.... "she was harmed"
Here is what she wants to swear upon:
003.028
Let not the believers take disbelievers non-muslims
for
their friends in preference to believers. Whoso doeth that hath no connection
with Allah unless it be that ye but guard yourselves against them, taking as it were
security. Telling lies - is
permissible in Islam!
033.061
They shall have a curse on them: whenever they are found,
they shall be seized and slain without mercy.
Murder - is permissible in Islam!
Aren't those teachings harmful? especially to a whole society should those
teachings be fed to the children? - the very future of that society?
She used
the part of the state law that allows someone to affirm to tell the truth while
holding their hand upraised, rather than swearing on the King James Bible available in the
courtrooms.
Mat 19:18
Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt
not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness
ACLU lawyer Seth Cohen said Thursday
that the organization disagrees with the judge's finding and he is confidant
they will win in the N.C. Court of Appeals.
"It's a shame that this matter cannot
be resolved sooner," he said. "All we have ever asked is that people of all
faiths be able to put their hands on the holy text of their choice. It's that
simple. We don't understand why this is such a big deal."
047.004
Therefore, when ye meet
'''the Unbelievers''' in fight, smite at
their necks.
{Behead them!
What part of that command from the Koran is
'holy' ???
And why does the ACLU make such a big deal over the Ten
Commandments displays?
This is what the ACLU is defending -
In the Koran:
008.067
It is not fitting for a prophet that he should have prisoners of war [slay them first]
until he hath thoroughly subdued the land. {Treason - in America
Article. III. Section. 3. - of the constitution of the United
States
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying
War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and
Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of
two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The ACLU is giving Aid and Comfort to a religion
that practices Clear Treason! - on a level that a child can understand.
Why is America tolerating it? How wise is it to tolerate
the intolerable?
For that woman to say she was hurt - is laughable. But
what she wants to plant in American courts - is not laughable! Not one bit!
The issue surfaced this summer after
Guilford County's top two judges turned down a gift of Qurans from a Greensboro
Islamic center after they decided that an oath on the Quran is not a legal oath.
State law refers to someone laying
his hand on the "Holy Scriptures," which they interpret to mean the Christian
Bible. When the state Administrative Office of the Courts declined to intervene,
the ACLU took the issue to court, arguing that the term "Holy Scriptures" is
broad enough to include many religious texts. If the courts determine otherwise,
the ACLU argues that the law is unconstitutional because it favors one religion
over another.
Article.
VII of the constitution of the United States of America:
Done in Convention by
the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September
IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD
one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven {that year signifies Only One Possible
Lord for America] and of the Independence of the United States of
America.
The US Constitution exposes the lies of the ACLU.
The debate has garnered national
attention, and not all Muslims agree that it's a worthwhile cause.
{FOR SURE!!!
Such an issue will bring attention to the actual teachings of the Koran
Cohen said Thursday that the issue
goes far beyond the Quran. For example, he said, Jews want to be allowed to
swear an oath on the Old Testament.
"That's the one thing that's gotten
lost in this case," Cohen said.
America was not founded by 'Jewish religions'.
Nevertheless...
Jer 31:31
Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and
with the house of Judah:
Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made
with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of
the land of Egypt;
Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I
will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put
my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their
God, and they shall be my people.
Jer 31:34
And
they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and
every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for
they shall all know me, from the least of them unto
the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I
will remember their sin
breaking
the Old Covenant no more.
How
do Jewish religions explain away those Holy Scriptures that are found in the Old
Testament?
Hbr 8:13
In that He saith, A new covenant, He hath made the first old.
Psa 2:12
Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is
kindled but a little. {Eternal life is at stake
Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.

Ye shall know them
by their fruits
|